From: Brian Menard
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:03:37 AM
Young:
Been thinking about you much as we get closer to Inauguration      Day.  Johanna, who lives just outside DC, will have no floor space in      her apartment as every inch will be filled with out-of-towners joining the      throng on the Mall for the big event.  I'm very jealous - just 'cuz I      didn't vote for him doesn't mean I can't appreciate the incredibly historic      moment this is in our nation's history.  You know, of the two      inaugurations I've attended, one was GOP (1973) and one was Dem (1993).
So far I am about as pleased as I could HOPE to be with the way Obama      has set things up.  There are things I really don't like, people      he's bringing in that worry me greatly or that just make me nervous      regarding what I expect they will do, etc.  But that's part of reaching      across the aisle, and so far I believe he IS following through on his      rhetoric to do so.  He's pre-governing quite differently than his      campaign policy pronouncements implied, probably as much to your chagrin as      to my relief.  Not that I'm pleased with the policy overall; were it up      to me, I'd move things much further my direction; but, I'm pleased that he's      making the early movements to bring folks together in a way that both you      and I can be equally displeased with the ultimate output!  That's what      deliberative democracy is all about, right?
Cheers in the new year!
Brian
----------------
From: Young H. Kim
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:48      PM
Well, I know one thing; our blog is awfully lonely these days. ;-) I      know I sound like a broken record, but let's get more of our thoughts      there.
I may have given many people here and elsewhere the impression      that I am some sort of a fan or a diehard supporter of Obama, but I realized      over the course of our emailing/blogging that I'm more of an      ideologue/pragmatist but probably an extremist when seen from      conservative views.  However, I would never partake in anything even      remotely resembling a "cult of personality," let alone over a      politician.  When I saw/read the contents of the Time Person of the      Year issue, it made me cringe.  For one thing, I don't get the hubbub      over Rick Warren being chosen for the invocation.  Not that I totally      agree with the man, but is this where the liberals must draw the line?       And always over the gay rights issue?  Are we to dismiss people who      have strongly held religious beliefs whether they are right or      wrong depending on the argument?
It is obvious that many are/will be disappointed with the Obama      transition's and future admin's decisions and policies.  The      pre-election PBS Frontline program illustrated and foreshadowed this by      telling the fallout from Obama becoming the Harvard Law Review      president.  He ended up removing the doubts of the conservative wing      and disappointing the liberals.  So I have no illusions of Obama being      the savior of the liberal agenda.  I believe he has and will always      follow the prudent and compromising path, not to mention that the current      economic and national security concerns will dictate his limited options and      no-drama decisions.  As you said, in the end, he will disappoint and      displease both parties, and I have been ready for a while to accept that as      the reality.  Obama will set his mark as a politician and a statesman in      this fashion, much like Lincoln and FDR, as I can only hope.  One thing      I do still wonder about him is where will he draw the line and take a stand      (e.g. economic stimulus, universal healthcare and the Iraq war) or will his      "achievements" be a string of lukewarm compromises and      could-have-beens?
My best to you as always,
Young
------------------
From: Brian Menard
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 1:29:01    PM
Agreed on the issue of "the line".  He could be a statesman like    Lincoln or FDR, or he could merely be a policy production factory like    LBJ.  As always, time will tell.
Let's hope for the good, and keep doing our part to come together.     I think it was Mike Huckabee who said recently that it is good Obama won    decisively, so he can clearly be the president for all of us.  I think    that is one deficit from which Bush could never break free.     His Texas record was very much crossing party lines and working in bipartisan    fashion, but because there was so much bad blood over 2000 (and even 2004),    folks were not inclined to move that way in DC.  As I've maintained    previously, Obama has a great opportunity that allows him to be a statesman    instead of just another politician.  There is much he can do to screw    that up, and little he can do to keep that opportunity alive.  So far,    I've got to give him credit for sticking to the harder, higher, better    path.
Onward...e pluribus unum, meus amicus.
Brian
---------------------------
From: Young H.    Kim
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 1:41    PM
And you know I have to respond as to the following:
1) LBJ the "policy    production factory"?  I suppose you refer to the War on Poverty/Great    Society (and the Vietnam War to a certain extent), as many conservatives    pinpoint that as the great downward spiral into a welfare    society.  Would you include the Civil Rights Act as a product of that    factory as well?  That seriously demeans the accomplishment, which was a    landmark legislation in US history, wouldn't you say?
2) Dubya had many, many chances to "cross party lines", especially after    9/11 when the political support was overwhelmingly behind him and our    nation.  But what were his bipartisan iniatives to reach out to    Dems?  I don't agree that he wasn't given a chance (let alone how he    ascended to the presidency); he squandered it, mainly with the    ill-conceived Iraq War.  I'm sure there will be many a Dubya apologist in    the next few years (e.g. no terrorist attacks since 9/11, etc.), but really    there's not much there in terms of what he accomplished over two terms, and    certainly not in a bipartisan mode.  The country is worse off by his    administration in all aspects.
I must say that there are plenty of GOPers and conservatives who    definitely are breathing a collective sigh of relief that they are not running    show and not (necessarily) directly responsible for cleaning up and fixing all    of the current problems.
"What is past is prologue"...let's look to the future but not forget how    we got here.
-------------------------
From: Brian Menard
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 6:16:14 PM
No intent to demean any of the legislation itself (I'll spare the debate  over the failure of the Great Society, and will remind you that the civil rights  legislation passed in the 1960s was passed only with the help of congressional  Republicans over the opposition of many leaders among congressional Democrats  who had stopped it up in committee for years), nor to take away from LBJ's  acumen as an accomplished legislator.  Remember that he was the Senate  Majority Leader before he went to the executive branch.  My intent was to  distinguish LBJ's legislative style (figure out what we can pass and get it  passed) from statemanlike leadership.  Much of LBJ's agenda he inherited  from the Kennedy administration, rather than initiating it himself.  LBJ,  bigoted Texan that he was, never would have pushed for the Civil Rights Act  - or the Voting Rights Act, which you left off your list - from his own  moral volition.  What he cared about more than the details of policy was  legislative accomplishment, whatever the details needed to make things work  out.  Speaking as a political scientist, not as a partisan, prioritizing  legislative accomplishment is often antithetical to statemanship, and vice  versa.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment