Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Fwd: Response to Young's Carter comment

From BRM via googlegroups...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Brian Menard" <brian_men...@hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 30 2008, 5:30 pm
Subject: Response to Young's Carter comment
To: AMoMaI Group


From my end of things, Carter had good reason to be defensive. The
"misery index" that he created to lambaste Ford in '76 had grown to a
double-digit albatross hanging around his own neck by '80. Foreign
affairs were a disaster. And things were a mess at home. Worst of
all, there was DISCO! Can't we blame that on Carter as well? BA, I
won't touch the ABBA thing; I know that wasn't your fault despite an
ethnic affiliation.

BRM

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

You mean his new "documentary".

BRM
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?



I'd not considered that T. Boone Pickens might join the Obama camp. Yeah, that would be a brilliant PR move. Actually, I'm hoping Oliver Stone's new movie "W" will have a greater influence. Talk about a master propagandist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sg7vwicPx98

BA

Just curious: Does anyone else think that the T. Boone Pickens push
of the last couple weeks will be a brilliant and strategic free
advertisement for Obama when Pickens ultimately endorses Obama during the
general campaign? I agree with the need for developing renewable energy
resources beyond (not in place of) expanding current energy efforts, but I won't
be surprised when Pickens outs himself in the Obama camp.

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Might want to check-out the Mayhill Fowler's piece on the Huffington post - not entirely positive- seemed fair and balanced to me.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/baracks-berlin-gamble_b_115312.html

BA

________________________________
From: misterb_46@hotmail.com
To: brian_menard@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; b.adamson@comcast.net; briada@hotmail.com
CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:11:18 -0700


OK, but the guys on Fox & Friends (according to a clip on the Daily Show last week) showed Obama in front of German monument and wasted no time comparing his location and speech to that of Hitler back in the day.

Like a lot of folks these days, I only get my national news from the Daily Show and the Colbert Report. :)

MB

________________________________

From: brian_menard@hotmail.com
To: yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; misterb_46@hotmail.com; b.adamson@comcast.net; briada@hotmail.com
CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
Subject: Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:17:02 -0400

Actually, your dear friends at Fox News (real news portions, not opinion shows, and not Obermaneque "opinion pretending to be news" shows) did the best job of covering Obama on the trip (while also getting digs in at their ABC/CBS/NBC rivals for their giddy fawning coverage) with actual reporters reporting what happened, with whom he met, what was discussed, and what reactions come from it all. I agree that the European coverage, by and large, was more focused than the Americans' star struck coverage. That included telling about how his German crowd got pretty quiet when Obama said Europe needed to step up and do their part in Afghanistan (for which I give him great credit). Didn't catch much of that here, but maybe I missed it in my channel surfing between the "big three" majors, CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, and FOX.

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Let's face it - Obama screwed up by not visiting the hospitalized soldiers in Germany. One can only wonder what his true motivations were? Downer, little scary, perhaps he didn't want to face the reality of sacrifices made for a war that he did not start? Who knows... Can't defend Obama on this one. I think he made a mistake that will haunt him.

BA



From: brian_menard@hotmail.com
To: yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; b.adamson@comcast.net; briada@hotmail.com; misterb_46@hotmail.com
CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
Subject: Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:57:18 -0400


That could be what really happened, though my understanding tweaks a little differently: the Pentagon told him HE was most welcome to come but the media entourage had to stay out, at which point the campaign chose not to put him one-on-one with the soldiers in the hospital. Two versions of the same story? How could it be in our blessed media age?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:09 PM
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?


Actually, I'm tired of reading how the media is in favor of either of them over the other.

There's no convention in sight and we still have three months to go so it seems like the media is grasping for any story they can find. This Europe trip. That biopsy. This magazine cover. That trip to Pennsylvania.

As I understand Obama's aborted trip to Germany, the Pentagon asked him not to do it. Wherever he goes, he's going to have cameras whether he wants them or not (Wailing Wall for example) so I don't see how he really has to ask for them.

Enough already -- until the conventions.

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

OK, but the guys on Fox & Friends (according to a clip on the Daily Show last week) showed Obama in front of German monument and wasted no time comparing his location and speech to that of Hitler back in the day.

Like a lot of folks these days, I only get my national news from the Daily Show and the Colbert Report. :)

MB



From: brian_menard@hotmail.com
To: yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; misterb_46@hotmail.com; b.adamson@comcast.net; briada@hotmail.com
CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
Subject: Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:17:02 -0400

Actually, your dear friends at Fox News (real news portions, not opinion shows, and not Obermaneque "opinion pretending to be news" shows) did the best job of covering Obama on the trip (while also getting digs in at their ABC/CBS/NBC rivals for their giddy fawning coverage) with actual reporters reporting what happened, with whom he met, what was discussed, and what reactions come from it all. I agree that the European coverage, by and large, was more focused than the Americans' star struck coverage. That included telling about how his German crowd got pretty quiet when Obama said Europe needed to step up and do their part in Afghanistan (for which I give him great credit). Didn't catch much of that here, but maybe I missed it in my channel surfing between the "big three" majors, CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, and FOX.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:52 PM
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?


Brian M.

"Though I'm buried with reading and writing for a class, I can't sit out any longer on all the "media are for McCain" comments. Are we really in such different worlds that you guys think the media are shilling for McCain when Obama just did his superstar world tour with the three major network anchors and their accompanying entourages in tow? In my world, all their attention gave him a nice poll bump, though he somehow seems to have managed to lose much of it again in just a couple days despite all the fawning media efforts to help him any way they can."

Sorry, but I've got to comment on the above topic.

Yes, we really are in different worlds... Because, left-wingers are focusing on the story around the story. The story as told by the corporate media was Obama as "Rock Star" - - McCain criticizes Obama for not going overseas and then criticizes him for going overseas - - Looks like grandpa is the flip-flopper.

The media story was about the media covering the story. What is enlightening though is how little the media actually covered Obama, what Obama did and what Obama said. Instead the media was the message. The story was all about how big the story was. So, we're all left with the knowledge that Obama went to Europe and took an entourage of media with him to cover his big trip? What did we actually learn about that trip? What was actually covered? Just the story about how big the story was? How bizarre. Look at how Obama was covered in Europe. In Europe Obama was the story; In America the medias coverage of Obama was the story. Remember, Neil Postmans landmark book on television, "The medium is the message."

Brian Adamson

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Since Pickens had a lot to do with the financing of the Swiftboating of Kerry in 2004, I'd like to think he's trying to make up for that now. :)

If Pickens is serious about his energy ideas -- and it sounds like he is -- I believe he'll support whichever candidate is more in line with his goals.

MB



From: brian_menard@hotmail.com
To: briada@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; b.adamson@comcast.net; misterb_46@hotmail.com
CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
Subject: Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:05:46 -0400



Just curious: Does anyone else think that the T. Boone Pickens push of the last couple weeks will be a brilliant and strategic free advertisement for Obama when Pickens ultimately endorses Obama during the general campaign? I agree with the need for developing renewable energy resources beyond (not in place of) expanding current energy efforts, but I won't be surprised when Pickens outs himself in the Obama camp.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:38 PM
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?


Yeah, what should Obama's group work on first: bringing the worst of this current administration to "justice" (we all know at worst it will be vacations in white-collar prisons) or trying to fix an economy stalled in 20th-century thinking (forget pre-9/11 thinking nonsense) while the rest of the developed world catches us and passes us?

The America of the good old days would seize on a chance to show the world how we can lead on wind and solar power innovations, but this administration (and McCain because he doesn't seem to know any better) whines and stomps its feet when it can't just dig bigger holes in the ground and sea whenever it wants to -- like it used to.

I don't mind more research into safer nuclear power (does that mean this administration wants to finally stop picking on France), but it's beyond time to look for more places to drill for oil and dig for coal and oil shale. Wind, water, and solar power will be around a lot longer than anything else and (IMHO) it doesn't look as bad when we try to build things to take advantage of wind, water, and solar power.

MB

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

I'd not considered that T. Boone Pickens might join the Obama camp. Yeah, that would be a brilliant PR move. Actually, I'm hoping Oliver Stone's new movie "W" will have a greater influence. Talk about a master propagandist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sg7vwicPx98

BA

Just curious: Does anyone else think that the T. Boone Pickens push
of the last couple weeks will be a brilliant and strategic free
advertisement for Obama when Pickens ultimately endorses Obama during the
general campaign? I agree with the need for developing renewable energy
resources beyond (not in place of) expanding current energy efforts, but I won't
be surprised when Pickens outs himself in the Obama camp.


BRM

Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

One other element about the story being about the story, though, is that there is actually something important for voters to know in what the media are doing in this election. Voters need to understand that the "facts" reported on Oberman and O'Reilly and Hannity and Dobbs and Courick are the chosen frosting and not the core essence. That can't come from 17 seconds of coverage in a story or 90 seconds of rant. When major media refuse to print the op-ed of a presumptive presidential nominee or focus coverage during one candidate's trip abroad on his opponent's concentration on domestic issues then blatantly cast coverage of the other's first significant trip abroad as the pre-beginning of the Presumptive President's administration instead of like Dorothy emerging in deep awe from her black-and-white house into the full-color world of OZ, there is a story there that voters should know.

BRM

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:52 PM
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?



Brian M.

"Though I'm buried with reading and writing for a class, I can't sit out any longer on all the "media are for McCain" comments. Are we really in such different worlds that you guys think the media are shilling for McCain when Obama just did his superstar world tour with the three major network anchors and their accompanying entourages in tow? In my world, all their attention gave him a nice poll bump, though he somehow seems to have managed to lose much of it again in just a couple days despite all the fawning media efforts to help him any way they can."

Sorry, but I've got to comment on the above topic.

Yes, we really are in different worlds... Because, left-wingers are focusing on the story around the story. The story as told by the corporate media was Obama as "Rock Star" - - McCain criticizes Obama for not going overseas and then criticizes him for going overseas - - Looks like grandpa is the flip-flopper.

The media story was about the media covering the story. What is enlightening though is how little the media actually covered Obama, what Obama did and what Obama said. Instead the media was the message. The story was all about how big the story was. So, we're all left with the knowledge that Obama went to Europe and took an entourage of media with him to cover his big trip? What did we actually learn about that trip? What was actually covered? Just the story about how big the story was? How bizarre. Look at how Obama was covered in Europe. In Europe Obama was the story; In America the medias coverage of Obama was the story. Remember, Neil Postmans landmark book on television, "The medium is the message."

Brian Adamson

Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Actually, your dear friends at Fox News (real news portions, not opinion shows, and not Obermaneque "opinion pretending to be news" shows) did the best job of covering Obama on the trip (while also getting digs in at their ABC/CBS/NBC rivals for their giddy fawning coverage) with actual reporters reporting what happened, with whom he met, what was discussed, and what reactions come from it all. I agree that the European coverage, by and large, was more focused than the Americans' star struck coverage. That included telling about how his German crowd got pretty quiet when Obama said Europe needed to step up and do their part in Afghanistan (for which I give him great credit). Didn't catch much of that here, but maybe I missed it in my channel surfing between the "big three" majors, CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, and FOX.

BRM
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:52 PM
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?



Brian M.

"Though I'm buried with reading and writing for a class, I can't sit out any longer on all the "media are for McCain" comments. Are we really in such different worlds that you guys think the media are shilling for McCain when Obama just did his superstar world tour with the three major network anchors and their accompanying entourages in tow? In my world, all their attention gave him a nice poll bump, though he somehow seems to have managed to lose much of it again in just a couple days despite all the fawning media efforts to help him any way they can."

Sorry, but I've got to comment on the above topic.

Yes, we really are in different worlds... Because, left-wingers are focusing on the story around the story. The story as told by the corporate media was Obama as "Rock Star" - - McCain criticizes Obama for not going overseas and then criticizes him for going overseas - - Looks like grandpa is the flip-flopper.

The media story was about the media covering the story. What is enlightening though is how little the media actually covered Obama, what Obama did and what Obama said. Instead the media was the message. The story was all about how big the story was. So, we're all left with the knowledge that Obama went to Europe and took an entourage of media with him to cover his big trip? What did we actually learn about that trip? What was actually covered? Just the story about how big the story was? How bizarre. Look at how Obama was covered in Europe. In Europe Obama was the story; In America the medias coverage of Obama was the story. Remember, Neil Postmans landmark book on television, "The medium is the message."

Brian Adamson

Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Just curious: Does anyone else think that the T. Boone Pickens push of the last couple weeks will be a brilliant and strategic free advertisement for Obama when Pickens ultimately endorses Obama during the general campaign? I agree with the need for developing renewable energy resources beyond (not in place of) expanding current energy efforts, but I won't be surprised when Pickens outs himself in the Obama camp.

BRM

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:38 PM
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?



Yeah, what should Obama's group work on first: bringing the worst of this current administration to "justice" (we all know at worst it will be vacations in white-collar prisons) or trying to fix an economy stalled in 20th-century thinking (forget pre-9/11 thinking nonsense) while the rest of the developed world catches us and passes us?

The America of the good old days would seize on a chance to show the world how we can lead on wind and solar power innovations, but this administration (and McCain because he doesn't seem to know any better) whines and stomps its feet when it can't just dig bigger holes in the ground and sea whenever it wants to -- like it used to.

I don't mind more research into safer nuclear power (does that mean this administration wants to finally stop picking on France), but it's beyond time to look for more places to drill for oil and dig for coal and oil shale. Wind, water, and solar power will be around a lot longer than anything else and (IMHO) it doesn't look as bad when we try to build things to take advantage of wind, water, and solar power.

MB

Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

That could be what really happened, though my understanding tweaks a little differently: the Pentagon told him HE was most welcome to come but the media entourage had to stay out, at which point the campaign chose not to put him one-on-one with the soldiers in the hospital. Two versions of the same story? How could it be in our blessed media age?

BRM
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:09 PM
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?



Actually, I'm tired of reading how the media is in favor of either of them over the other.

There's no convention in sight and we still have three months to go so it seems like the media is grasping for any story they can find. This Europe trip. That biopsy. This magazine cover. That trip to Pennsylvania.

As I understand Obama's aborted trip to Germany, the Pentagon asked him not to do it. Wherever he goes, he's going to have cameras whether he wants them or not (Wailing Wall for example) so I don't see how he really has to ask for them.

Enough already -- until the conventions.



From: brian_menard@hotmail.com
To: yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; misterb_46@hotmail.com; b.adamson@comcast.net; briada@hotmail.com
CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
Subject: Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:01:55 -0400



Though I'm buried with reading and writing for a class, I can't sit out any longer on all the "media are for McCain" comments. Are we really in such different worlds that you guys think the media are shilling for McCain when Obama just did his superstar world tour with the three major network anchors and their accompanying entourages in tow? In my world, all their attention gave him a nice poll bump, though he somehow seems to have managed to lose much of it again in just a couple days despite all the fawning media efforts to help him any way they can. The decision to cancel the hospital trip in Germany because he couldn't bring the cameras with him to exploit the wounded soldiers in a "Look how ready I am to be Commander in Chief" ad was a mistake that hurts him a little now, but I expect it will hurt him more as we get closer to election day. Meanwhile, McCain, despite not running a good campaign at all and despite the media alternating between ignoring him (such as when he went on his own international trip a few weeks ago) and hitting him, somehow remains competitive in the race.

Monday, July 28, 2008

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

http://www.alternet.org/election08/92942/frank_rich%3A_how_obama%27s_trip_abroad_turned_him_into_the_acting_president/?page=1

MB



From: b.adamson@comcast.net
To: misterb_46@hotmail.com; briada@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; brian_menard@hotmail.com
CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:10:58 +0000

One of the big three stories on Obama's trip to Europe was how poorly Americans would perceive his popularity in Europe.  Again, the story was about the story.  "That's not change we can believe in my friends."

BA
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: misterb_46@hotmail.com
To: briada@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; brian_menard@hotmail.com; b.adamson@comcast.net
CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:38:18 +0000

Yeah, what should Obama's group work on first: bringing the worst of this current administration to "justice" (we all know at worst it will be vacations in white-collar prisons) or trying to fix an economy stalled in 20th-century thinking (forget pre-9/11 thinking nonsense) while the rest of the developed world catches us and passes us?

The America of the good old days would seize on a chance to show the world how we can lead on wind and solar power innovations, but this administration (and McCain because he doesn't seem to know any better) whines and stomps its feet when it can't just dig bigger holes in the ground and sea whenever it wants to -- like it used to.

I don't mind more research into safer nuclear power (does that mean this administration wants to finally stop picking on France), but it's beyond time to look for more places to drill for oil and dig for coal and oil shale. Wind, water, and solar power will be around a lot longer than anything else and (IMHO) it doesn't look as bad when we try to build things to take advantage of wind, water, and solar power.

MB



> From: briada@hotmail.com
> To: misterb_46@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; brian_menard@hotmail.com; b.adamson@comcast.net
> CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
> Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:16:27 +0000
>
>
> Michael, Wow! "One reason Obama might be the next Carter is because of the mess left behind by the previous president. There's no way it will get fixed in one term. There should be progress in the right direction if Obama wants another term, but Carter faced the same economic issues (inflation, high gas prices, recession) that Bush would be facing if he was running again." I believe that you really pointed-out our worst fears and perhaps our biggest dilemma. We need a liberal democrat with almost dictatorial powers. We need an FDR for our age. We don't need to compromise on the big issues and we don't need another preacher - - like Jimmy Carter, who asked Americans to sacrifice, turn down the heat and drive slower. Instead, we need a president that will investigate and pursue criminal charges against those neo-cons and others that have broken the law. We need a president that will demand new CAFE standards and implement a new energy policy that goes beyond drilling more wells.
>
> The next Democrat has a mess to clean and worse, most Americans probably have no concept of how big, or bad that mess has become.
>
> George "Hoover" Bush and Family have taking the largest creditor nation on earth and transformed it into the largest debtor nation the world has ever seen. Our stock market is down, our dollar is weak, our trade surplus is non-existent. In fact, we have become what we used to make fun of. The classic definition of a third world nation is one that exports raw material and imports finished "value-added" products. Free trade and neo-con economic policies have made the United States weaker and more vulnerable today than at perhaps any other time in recent memory.
>
> BA

Obama in Europe

One of the big three stories on Obama's trip to Europe was how poorly Americans would perceive his popularity in Europe. Again, the story was about the story. "That's not change we can believe in my friends."

BA

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Brian M.

"Though I'm buried with reading and writing for a class, I can't sit out any longer on all the "media are for McCain" comments. Are we really in such different worlds that you guys think the media are shilling for McCain when Obama just did his superstar world tour with the three major network anchors and their accompanying entourages in tow? In my world, all their attention gave him a nice poll bump, though he somehow seems to have managed to lose much of it again in just a couple days despite all the fawning media efforts to help him any way they can."

Sorry, but I've got to comment on the above topic.

Yes, we really are in different worlds... Because, left-wingers are focusing on the story around the story. The story as told by the corporate media was Obama as "Rock Star" - - McCain criticizes Obama for not going overseas and then criticizes him for going overseas - - Looks like grandpa is the flip-flopper.

The media story was about the media covering the story. What is enlightening though is how little the media actually covered Obama, what Obama did and what Obama said. Instead the media was the message. The story was all about how big the story was. So, we're all left with the knowledge that Obama went to Europe and took an entourage of media with him to cover his big trip? What did we actually learn about that trip? What was actually covered? Just the story about how big the story was? How bizarre. Look at how Obama was covered in Europe. In Europe Obama was the story; In America the medias coverage of Obama was the story. Remember, Neil Postmans landmark book on television, "The medium is the message."

Brian Adamson

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Yeah, what should Obama's group work on first: bringing the worst of this current administration to "justice" (we all know at worst it will be vacations in white-collar prisons) or trying to fix an economy stalled in 20th-century thinking (forget pre-9/11 thinking nonsense) while the rest of the developed world catches us and passes us?

The America of the good old days would seize on a chance to show the world how we can lead on wind and solar power innovations, but this administration (and McCain because he doesn't seem to know any better) whines and stomps its feet when it can't just dig bigger holes in the ground and sea whenever it wants to -- like it used to.

I don't mind more research into safer nuclear power (does that mean this administration wants to finally stop picking on France), but it's beyond time to look for more places to drill for oil and dig for coal and oil shale. Wind, water, and solar power will be around a lot longer than anything else and (IMHO) it doesn't look as bad when we try to build things to take advantage of wind, water, and solar power.

MB





> From: briada@hotmail.com
> To: misterb_46@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; brian_menard@hotmail.com; b.adamson@comcast.net
> CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
> Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:16:27 +0000
>
>
> Michael, Wow! "One reason Obama might be the next Carter is because of the mess left behind by the previous president. There's no way it will get fixed in one term. There should be progress in the right direction if Obama wants another term, but Carter faced the same economic issues (inflation, high gas prices, recession) that Bush would be facing if he was running again." I believe that you really pointed-out our worst fears and perhaps our biggest dilemma. We need a liberal democrat with almost dictatorial powers. We need an FDR for our age. We don't need to compromise on the big issues and we don't need another preacher - - like Jimmy Carter, who asked Americans to sacrifice, turn down the heat and drive slower. Instead, we need a president that will investigate and pursue criminal charges against those neo-cons and others that have broken the law. We need a president that will demand new CAFE standards and implement a new energy policy that goes beyond drilling more wells.
>
> The next Democrat has a mess to clean and worse, most Americans probably have no concept of how big, or bad that mess has become.
>
> George "Hoover" Bush and Family have taking the largest creditor nation on earth and transformed it into the largest debtor nation the world has ever seen. Our stock market is down, our dollar is weak, our trade surplus is non-existent. In fact, we have become what we used to make fun of. The classic definition of a third world nation is one that exports raw material and imports finished "value-added" products. Free trade and neo-con economic policies have made the United States weaker and more vulnerable today than at perhaps any other time in recent memory.
>
> BA
>
________________________________
> From: misterb_46@hotmail.com
> To: briada@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; brian_menard@hotmail.com; b.adamson@comcast.net
> CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
> Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:19:45 -0700
>
> McCain's ads may be sharp, but he himself, is far from it -- other than repeating the same, tired right-wing and neo-con talking points. That's going to be more widely-known later on than it is now.
>
> One reason Obama might be the next Carter is because of the mess left behind by the previous president. There's no way it will get fixed in one term. There should be progress in the right direction if Obama wants another term, but Carter faced the same economic issues (inflation, high gas prices, recession) that Bush would be facing if he was running again.
>
> Obama is OK, in my opinion, staying above the fray until the debates or the convention. Let McCain dig his own political hole by appearing yet again to sell out the very things that made him so popular across the spectrum in 2000.

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Michael, Wow! "One reason Obama might be the next Carter is because of the mess left behind by the previous president. There's no way it will get fixed in one term. There should be progress in the right direction if Obama wants another term, but Carter faced the same economic issues (inflation, high gas prices, recession) that Bush would be facing if he was running again." I believe that you really pointed-out our worst fears and perhaps our biggest dilemma. We need a liberal democrat with almost dictatorial powers. We need an FDR for our age. We don't need to compromise on the big issues and we don't need another preacher - - like Jimmy Carter, who asked Americans to sacrifice, turn down the heat and drive slower. Instead, we need a president that will investigate and pursue criminal charges against those neo-cons and others that have broken the law. We need a president that will demand new CAFE standards and implement a new energy policy that goes beyond drilling more wells.

The next Democrat has a mess to clean and worse, most Americans probably have no concept of how big, or bad that mess has become.

George "Hoover" Bush and Family have taking the largest creditor nation on earth and transformed it into the largest debtor nation the world has ever seen. Our stock market is down, our dollar is weak, our trade surplus is non-existent. In fact, we have become what we used to make fun of. The classic definition of a third world nation is one that exports raw material and imports finished "value-added" products. Free trade and neo-con economic policies have made the United States weaker and more vulnerable today than at perhaps any other time in recent memory.

BA

________________________________
From: misterb_46@hotmail.com
To: briada@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; brian_menard@hotmail.com; b.adamson@comcast.net
CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
Subject: RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:19:45 -0700

McCain's ads may be sharp, but he himself, is far from it -- other than repeating the same, tired right-wing and neo-con talking points. That's going to be more widely-known later on than it is now.

One reason Obama might be the next Carter is because of the mess left behind by the previous president. There's no way it will get fixed in one term. There should be progress in the right direction if Obama wants another term, but Carter faced the same economic issues (inflation, high gas prices, recession) that Bush would be facing if he was running again.

Obama is OK, in my opinion, staying above the fray until the debates or the convention. Let McCain dig his own political hole by appearing yet again to sell out the very things that made him so popular across the spectrum in 2000.

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Actually, I'm tired of reading how the media is in favor of either of them over the other.

There's no convention in sight and we still have three months to go so it seems like the media is grasping for any story they can find. This Europe trip. That biopsy. This magazine cover. That trip to Pennsylvania.

As I understand Obama's aborted trip to Germany, the Pentagon asked him not to do it. Wherever he goes, he's going to have cameras whether he wants them or not (Wailing Wall for example) so I don't see how he really has to ask for them.

Enough already -- until the conventions.

MB




From: brian_menard@hotmail.com
To: yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; misterb_46@hotmail.com; b.adamson@comcast.net; briada@hotmail.com
CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
Subject: Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:01:55 -0400


Though I'm buried with reading and writing for a class, I can't sit out any longer on all the "media are for McCain" comments. Are we really in such different worlds that you guys think the media are shilling for McCain when Obama just did his superstar world tour with the three major network anchors and their accompanying entourages in tow? In my world, all their attention gave him a nice poll bump, though he somehow seems to have managed to lose much of it again in just a couple days despite all the fawning media efforts to help him any way they can. The decision to cancel the hospital trip in Germany because he couldn't bring the cameras with him to exploit the wounded soldiers in a "Look how ready I am to be Commander in Chief" ad was a mistake that hurts him a little now, but I expect it will hurt him more as we get closer to election day. Meanwhile, McCain, despite not running a good campaign at all and despite the media alternating between ignoring him (such as when he went on his own international trip a few weeks ago) and hitting him, somehow remains competitive in the race.

Re: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Though I'm buried with reading and writing for a class, I can't sit out any longer on all the "media are for McCain" comments. Are we really in such different worlds that you guys think the media are shilling for McCain when Obama just did his superstar world tour with the three major network anchors and their accompanying entourages in tow? In my world, all their attention gave him a nice poll bump, though he somehow seems to have managed to lose much of it again in just a couple days despite all the fawning media efforts to help him any way they can. The decision to cancel the hospital trip in Germany because he couldn't bring the cameras with him to exploit the wounded soldiers in a "Look how ready I am to be Commander in Chief" ad was a mistake that hurts him a little now, but I expect it will hurt him more as we get closer to election day. Meanwhile, McCain, despite not running a good campaign at all and despite the media alternating between ignoring him (such as when he went on his own international trip a few weeks ago) and hitting him, somehow remains competitive in the race.

Brian M.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 8:20 PM
Subject: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?



Watching the Sunday morning talk shows was a little more than just disconcerting. Obama appeared on the defensive and brought back memories of Jimmy Carter during the Iran hostage crisis. Obama was unable to steer the conversation, or questions away from neo-con talking points. As a result, Obama like Jimmy Carter, was being manipulated by the media, not manipulating and controlling the medium. For example, he was defending his trip to Europe; defending his decision not to drill offshore; and defending his position against the surge in Iraq - - even to the extent of refusing to admit in hindsight that his position against the surge may have been incorrect. On the other hand, McCAIN appeared strong and on the offense. McCain was not asked any questions about his votes against veterans, or the fact that he voted (with Bush) for the war to begin with. In fact, the corporate-media has spent an inordinate amount of time confronting Obama with right-wing talking points. What's interesting is Obama's sheepish response to them. One wonders if Obama realizes that he and most American are being manipulated by master right-wing propagandist. McCains political ads are clear, sharp and visible. In fact, ads have already appeared to characterize Obama as anti-veteran, and anti-troops. Where are the Obama attack ads? Where is the Democratic response? Obama has a better record on veterans issues than does McCain. McCain voted against the new G.I. bill, for example.

The corporate media is pro-McCAIN. Is Mr. nice guy: Obama going, to define the issues, or let right-wing talking heads define Obama and his political agenda?

Worse, left-wing radio continued the attack against Obama. "Where are the attack ads?" One wonders why Obama has chosen to campaign against McCain in much the same way that he campaigned against Hillary. It's a different show now. Does Obama assume that Americans "get it" and see through the negative advertising, right-wing talking points and spin? He's in a fight for his political life here, and I don't believe he fully comprehends the gravity of his situation. We've got roughly 100 days to get the message out - - and it is not happening.

RE: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

McCain's ads may be sharp, but he himself, is far from it -- other than repeating the same, tired right-wing and neo-con talking points. That's going to be more widely-known later on than it is now.

One reason Obama might be the next Carter is because of the mess left behind by the previous president. There's no way it will get fixed in one term. There should be progress in the right direction if Obama wants another term, but Carter faced the same economic issues (inflation, high gas prices, recession) that Bush would be facing if he was running again.

Obama is OK, in my opinion, staying above the fray until the debates or the convention. Let McCain dig his own political hole by appearing yet again to sell out the very things that made him so popular across the spectrum in 2000.

Mike




> From: briada@hotmail.com
> To: yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; brian_menard@hotmail.com; misterb_46@hotmail.com; b.adamson@comcast.net
> CC: yhkpenguin.amomai@blogger.com
> Subject: Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:20:55 +0000
>
>
> Watching the Sunday morning talk shows was a little more than just disconcerting. Obama appeared on the defensive and brought back memories of Jimmy Carter during the Iran hostage crisis. Obama was unable to steer the conversation, or questions away from neo-con talking points. As a result, Obama like Jimmy Carter, was being manipulated by the media, not manipulating and controlling the medium. For example, he was defending his trip to Europe; defending his decision not to drill offshore; and defending his position against the surge in Iraq - - even to the extent of refusing to admit in hindsight that his position against the surge may have been incorrect. On the other hand, McCAIN appeared strong and on the offense. McCain was not asked any questions about his votes against veterans, or the fact that he voted (with Bush) for the war to begin with. In fact, the corporate-media has spent an inordinate amount of time confronting Obama with right-wing talking points. What's interesting is Obama's sheepish response to them. One wonders if Obama realizes that he and most American are being manipulated by master right-wing propagandist. McCains political ads are clear, sharp and visible. In fact, ads have already appeared to characterize Obama as anti-veteran, and anti-troops. Where are the Obama attack ads? Where is the Democratic response? Obama has a better record on veterans issues than does McCain. McCain voted against the new G.I. bill, for example.
>
> The corporate media is pro-McCAIN. Is Mr. nice guy: Obama going, to define the issues, or let right-wing talking heads define Obama and his political agenda?
>
> Worse, left-wing radio continued the attack against Obama. "Where are the attack ads?" One wonders why Obama has chosen to campaign against McCain in much the same way that he campaigned against Hillary. It's a different show now. Does Obama assume that Americans "get it" and see through the negative advertising, right-wing talking points and spin? He's in a fight for his political life here, and I don't believe he fully comprehends the gravity of his situation. We've got roughly 100 days to get the message out - - and it is not happening.

Brian A.

Is Obama Really That Bad?

Brian M. Your comments on Obama make me believe that you are truly disenfranchised with Obama. While sympathetic, I wonder if the problem is with Obama, or with the rest of us (democrat/republican) when we consider Obama's rhetoric. Certainly, Obama is a bit of a litmus test for us all. We tend to see in him what we want to see - - At least until the charisma wears thin. I still believe that Obama is a new kind of politician, though a politician, nevertheless. Obama has remained more or less consistent to his rhetoric? As of late, he has disappointed the left-wing base of his party for some of his political compromises. Why then do Republicans also believe that Obama is misleading them?

Brian, writes "...What you see is what you get, let's all work together to solve the problems of our nation and our world. After months of checking him out with interest through the fall and winter of '06, my criticism since January '07 - when he finally started filling in some details to this "let's all pull together" rhetoric - is that there's nothing new here; he's really pushing the same left-wing agenda that has been pushed for a long, long time. He just does it much more smoothly, charismatically, and effectively than so many of his predecessors in the political limelight. The real message is, "To all you folks who support Republican policies and oppose my liberal agenda, we would all be better off, could have political harmony, and could solve important problems if you would just get out of our way let us do what we're trying to do." That's not post-partisan, that's hyperpartisan delivered with a friendly smile..."

Okay, fair enough, however, Obama's campaign has not been revolutionary in its honesty, purity, forthrightness, and positive tone?

Brian M., What in particular has led you to the following conclusion? "All the things that were supposed to set him apart from his Democratic (and Republican) competition. If he were the Real Deal, someone truly interested in bringing everyone together (instead of just bringing his opposition over to his side through whatever deceptive and insincere empty rhetorical means he and his campaign can muster), he would have much to offer despite having a relatively light record of accomplishment during his brief time on the national stage. Instead, he has shown himself to be just another politician willing to say and do whatever is necessary to get elected."

In other words, what makes Obama deceptive and insincere? Also, is it possible for any politician to win national office without some lack of full-disclosure as to their actual rather than perceived planned political agenda? For instance, how many Republicans are actually aware of Rev. Moons connections and influence with Republican political elites? http://www.gorenfeld.net/book/ Nevertheless, everyone knows about Obama's former pastor.

BA

Is Obama Another Jimmy Carter?

Watching the Sunday morning talk shows was a little more than just disconcerting. Obama appeared on the defensive and brought back memories of Jimmy Carter during the Iran hostage crisis. Obama was unable to steer the conversation, or questions away from neo-con talking points. As a result, Obama like Jimmy Carter, was being manipulated by the media, not manipulating and controlling the medium. For example, he was defending his trip to Europe; defending his decision not to drill offshore; and defending his position against the surge in Iraq - - even to the extent of refusing to admit in hindsight that his position against the surge may have been incorrect. On the other hand, McCAIN appeared strong and on the offense. McCain was not asked any questions about his votes against veterans, or the fact that he voted (with Bush) for the war to begin with. In fact, the corporate-media has spent an inordinate amount of time confronting Obama with right-wing talking points. What's interesting is Obama's sheepish response to them. One wonders if Obama realizes that he and most American are being manipulated by master right-wing propagandist. McCains political ads are clear, sharp and visible. In fact, ads have already appeared to characterize Obama as anti-veteran, and anti-troops. Where are the Obama attack ads? Where is the Democratic response? Obama has a better record on veterans issues than does McCain. McCain voted against the new G.I. bill, for example.

The corporate media is pro-McCAIN. Is Mr. nice guy: Obama going, to define the issues, or let right-wing talking heads define Obama and his political agenda?

Worse, left-wing radio continued the attack against Obama. "Where are the attack ads?" One wonders why Obama has chosen to campaign against McCain in much the same way that he campaigned against Hillary. It's a different show now. Does Obama assume that Americans "get it" and see through the negative advertising, right-wing talking points and spin? He's in a fight for his political life here, and I don't believe he fully comprehends the gravity of his situation. We've got roughly 100 days to get the message out - - and it is not happening.

Brian A.

FOXNews.com - Guard Confirms Late-Night Hotel Encounter Between Ex-Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum

Posting thread to our blog...

--- On Sat, 7/26/08, Michael Busick <misterb_46@hotmail.com> wrote:
From: Michael Busick <misterb_46@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: FOXNews.com - Guard Confirms Late-Night Hotel Encounter Between Ex-Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters - Politics Republican Party Democratic Party Political Spectrum
To: "Brian Menard" <brian_menard@hotmail.com>, "Young Kim" <yhkpenguin@yahoo.com>, "Brian Adamson" <briada@hotmail.com>
Date: Saturday, July 26, 2008, 8:27 PM

Well, I can tell you that the way I looked for them, I found a lot more than I left behind. You all may hear about a few duplicates this year, but I can almost guarantee they will be newly-created (thanks to the way Diebold sets up their database searches) or older ones that would've had to have been found specifically (name changes that I would've had to have run across).

I did three different database searches on each list of voters under the same birthdate (from 11/2/86 -- youngest you could be and vote in November of 2004 -- back to sometime in 1919 -- I still have the spreadsheet I used). By last name only (catching easy dups), then by house number of residential address (catching similar names who didn't move), and then by first name (catching women -- mostly -- who got married and then moved). I was starting to run out of people (not many around born before 1919) and then I would only find more that were new ones because the voters decided to go by their middle name this time around instead of their given name or first name. I tried for years to widen the search parameters so that more people would pop up as possible duplicates (only first initial of first name in common instead of first four, for example) and got the IT guys to open it up to two letters. Now, at least, the folks in Olympia are running their own searches (faster than I can), so a lot more are being caught automatically before I found them.

And, personally, I think what the right was able to do in Florida before the 2000 election constitutes voter fraud. Voters should not be surprised to find out on election day that their registrations have been cancelled. In Washington state, if your registration is inactive (due to returned mail, etc.) and you don't vote in two consecutive federal elections, you can be cancelled without knowing about it, but in Florida in 2000, voters were cancelled instantly (skipping the inactive stage) because their names were close to those of felons.

If even just one GOP councilperson showed, I wouldn't still be upset about it. He wouldn't even have to talk to us. :)




From: brian_menard@hotmail.com
To: yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; briada@hotmail.com; misterb_46@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: FOXNews.com - Guard Confirms Late-Night Hotel Encounter Between Ex-Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters - Politics Republican Party Democratic Party Political Spectrum
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:48:07 -0400

Mike:
As an election official for several years, and as a (now lapsed) political scientist, I offer you my heartfelt congratulations and appreciation for your service. That's a LOT of dups you found. Not as a Republican, but as a former Head TA for Larry Sabato (author of "Dirty Tricks," about the dark side games of American politics) and in "in the trenches" politico for the last 38 years, I do have to wonder how many more are out there. That's not a reflection on you; one person can do only so much, particularly when, as you point out, others in the office much longer than you have left without such accomplishment. But I also would be the first to say that it's not just the Right that cares about voter fraud, or that it's not just the Left that perpetrates it. Dirty Tricks haunt our system from all sides. (Just look at what was done to McCain in the 2000 primary season.) Kudos to you for all you did to clean things up in King County. BTW, the GOP councilors missed an opportunity by boycotting the pizza event; King County politics may be highly partisan, but that falls into the category of official duty.
BRM
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 9:23 PM
Subject: RE: FOXNews.com - Guard Confirms Late-Night Hotel Encounter Between Ex-Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters - Politics Republican Party Democratic Party Political Spectrum

It seems to me that Obama gets criticized for moving left AND moving to the center. I think he should just do what he wants to do, not give a damn about the polls and let the votes fall where they may.

It would certainly keep him in high regard with me -- unlike McCain's selling out since he ran in 2000.

First McCain's camp (and/or others on the right) criticized Obama for not going overseas enough and then when he does, they criticize him for either going to the wrong places (Brandenburg), not following through on his original plans (Germany to visit troops), or not campaigning at home.

Heck, Barack can't even privately visit the Western Wall without the media getting involved and everyone taking sides about what happened.

I'm glad presidential campaigns only happen once every four years -- even though they seem to start about halfway through the interim period.

As for the discussions, it's just easier for me to respond here rather than visit a blog. Plus, when the blog got started, I was working a job with a hellish commute (Bothell-Renton and back again) and now I'm not, so maybe I'd have more time now.

BTW, when I left the elections job in June, I was given a Certificate of Appreciation (signed by the elections director and the county executive) because of the 8,500 duplicate registrations I found on my own (in my spare time before and after my shift and sometimes at the end of my lunch period) in my three years there. A few of my co-workers there knew I was obsessed about finding as many as I could, but I didn't know I would get something like that because other people have worked there longer and left with nothing -- other than a signed card.

Of course, so many on the right would (might) see that and say, "Gee, if you found that many, I wonder how many there really are?" And the rest of us would (might) say, "I guess it's not just the right that seems to care about potential voter fraud." :)

A couple of years ago, the King County Council (5 Dems and 4 Reps) gave the elections office folks free pizza for lunch one day and hung around to talk to us. Only the Dems showed up. That's pure bullshit. No one in the elections office cares (or even knows) what party people choose. I'm very disappointed not one Republican could show up as even a token effort to congratulate us for doing a better job than we had been.



From: brian_menard@hotmail.com
To: misterb_46@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com; briada@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: FOXNews.com - Guard Confirms Late-Night Hotel Encounter Between Ex-Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters - Politics Republican Party Democratic Party Political Spectrum
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:56:54 -0400
Brian:
You just laid out in clear terms my disenchantment with Obama. The general claim from Obama/supporters to bring independents and Republicans into his camp is that he is post-partisan, pure and true, no political games, what you see is what you get, let's all work together to solve the problems of our nation and our world. After months of checking him out with interest through the fall and winter of '06, my criticism since January '07 - when he finally started filling in some details to this "let's all pull together" rhetoric - is that there's nothing new here; he's really pushing the same left-wing agenda that has been pushed for a long, long time. He just does it much more smoothly, charismatically, and effectively than so many of his predecessors in the political limelight. The real message is, "To all you folks who support Republican policies and oppose my liberal agenda, we would all be better off, could have political harmony, and could solve important problems if you would just get out of our way let us do what we're trying to do." That's not post-partisan, that's hyperpartisan delivered with a friendly smile. Obama's campaign has not been revolutionary in its honesty, purity, forthrightness, and positive tone...all the things that were supposed to set him apart from his Democratic (and Republican) competition. If he were the Real Deal, someone truly interested in bringing everyone together (instead of just bringing his opposition over to his side through whatever deceptive and insincere empty rhetorical means he and his campaign can muster), he would have much to offer despite having a relatively light record of accomplishment during his brief time on the national stage. Instead, he has shown himself to be just another politician willing to say and do whatever is necessary to get elected. From public financing of his campaign to his prognostications on the Surge strategy, political expedience seems more and more clearly to be what drives his campaign. I think this has the potential to be his Achilles heel in the campaign, for if more people snap out of his charismatic trance and shift from awe at his rhetorical skill to resentment over his doublespeak (more damaging because the doublespeak claims he won't do exactly what he is doing wit his doublespeak), this choice in how to conduct the campaign could damage his candidacy critically. Right now he's still got momentum, and if he stays ahead of the general public's awareness by distracting them with new lines to keep them from realizing the old lines were just lines, he'll win in November by anything from a squeaker (like Kennedy over Nixon in 1960) to a landslide (like Johnson over Goldwater in 1964). If, on the other hand, his rhetorical web starts to unravel, should his "Vote for me because I'm not like all those other politicians you dislike for their empty promises" cover be blown he has nothing to fall back on other than an empty record in the Senate boasting only the "most liberal senator" rating. In the interest of fair and objective analysis, I'm not saying McCain is without fault; but, if folks question McCain's sincerity about bringing people together, at least he can point to a long record of working with folks on the other side of the aisle in clear and direct contradiction of his own party's positions, even to the detriment of a President from his own party.
BRM
P.S. Young (et al.): Does this exchange of e-mails mean we are back on? Should we move back over to the blog? Or are we more successful at trading e-mails?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: FOXNews.com - Guard Confirms Late-Night Hotel Encounter Between Ex-Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters - Politics Republican Party Democratic Party Political Spectrum
Hmmm, well said. I'm hoping Obama is doing what he needs to, to get elected. Then, perhaps if we are lucky, he will govern as a Liberal. The jury is still out, but I'm still very hopeful.

-B.

"...I see you Mary in the garden
In the garden of a thousand sighs
There's holy pictures of our children
Dancin' in a sky filled with light
May I feel your arms around me
May I feel your blood mix with mine
A dream of life comes to me
Like a catfish dancin' on the end of the line

Sky of blackness and sorrow ( a dream of life)
Sky of love, sky of tears (a dream of life)
Sky of glory and sadness ( a dream of life)
Sky of mercy, sky of fear ( a dream of life)
Sky of memory and shadow ( a dream of life)
Your burnin' wind fills my arms tonight
Sky of longing and emptiness (a dream of life)
Sky of fullness, sky of blessed life ( a dream of life)..."
-Bruce Springsteen, the Rising

________________________________
From: misterb_46@hotmail.com
To: briada@hotmail.com; brian_menard@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: FOXNews.com - Guard Confirms Late-Night Hotel Encounter Between Ex-Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters - Politics Republican Party Democratic Party Political Spectrum
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:39:52 -0700

The way I heard it, the right was going to get Obama on the FISA bill regardless of which side he was on. Despite all this nonsense about a liberal media, the right still dictates who is more patriotic and/or concerned about America's safety.

He votes for it and it looks like he's against privacy rights.

He votes against it and it looks like he's against fighting the war on terror.

I had also read that voting for the FISA bill still gave him a chance to come back later and charge the telecoms with some kind of lawbreaking.

________________________________
> From: briada@hotmail.com
> To: misterb_46@hotmail.com; brian_menard@hotmail.com; yhkpenguin@yahoo.com
> Subject: RE: FOXNews.com - Guard Confirms Late-Night Hotel Encounter Between Ex-Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters - Politics Republican Party Democratic Party Political Spectrum
> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:00:56 +0000
>
> Say, what's up with Obama, these days? Mr. "nice guy" has me really concerned. Perhaps, Young was correct, early on, when he suggested that Hillary would use her experience and anger to really fight the Republican challenge. Sorry, Young , if my paraphrasing did not capture the spirit of your remarks, months ago?
>
> Anyway, Obama better become an attack dog and quickly, or he will not beat McCain in the swing states and most assuredly, will lose the election in November.
>
> Where are his attack ads? Why doesn't he point-out McCAIN's character flaws? McCAIN has consistently voted against veterans, for example.
>
> Also noteworthy, is Hills vote against F.I.S.A. Wondering, if we-all supported the wrong Democrat?
>
>
> -B.
> ______________________________
> I would've been very surprised if Edwards would've accepted the invite from McCain, given how John has sold out any independents that would've voted for him in 2000.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: brian_menard@hotmail.com
> To: fossriver@comcast.net; jmenard@u.washington.edu; johanna.menard@gmail.com; briada@hotmail.com; misterb_46@hotmail.com; YHKpenguin@yahoo.com
> Subject: FOXNews.com - Guard Confirms Late-Night Hotel Encounter Between Ex-Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters - Politics Republican Party Democratic Party Political Spectrum
> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:45:23 -0400
>
> Oops...guess Edwards is off Obama's short list now.
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,391426,00.html