Let's face it, folks. The GOP field is a sorry lot, and I'm not saying that just because I support the Democrats. James Carville wrote similar sentiments on CNN comparing the 2012 lot to the 1980 lot (I bet he had input from his GOP wife), and the whole much-ado-about-nothing for Chris Christie indicates the discontent among the conservative and the moderate Repubs.
From Mitt "The Flipflopping Mormon" Romney to Rick "Oops" Perry to Herman "Some of My Best Friends are Women who I've Never Harassed" Cain, the road to the nomination has been all about appeasing the far right Tea Party. Simply put, there are worthy Republican leaders who probably could actually have a shot at Barack "The Compromiser" Obama, but absolutely zero chance at surviving the nomination process.
It's fairly easy to think of two: Colin Powell and Rudy Giuliani. I, for one, would seriously consider voting for Powell. He is the most Reagan-esque candidate having the most centrist, moderate and independent appeal, and military credentials like Eisenhower. As for Giuliani, the recent tributes and re-tellings of the 9/11 10-year anniversary reminded me once again how his leadership skills were critical in the aftermath of the Twin Tower collapse, the obvious opportunities to earn political clout notwithstanding.
It's also obvious that it's too late in the campaign season to realistically consider a better GOP candidate entering the race for Iowa and New Hampshire. What a disappointing presidential campaign when compared to 2008. Am I right, folks?
No comments:
Post a Comment